Talk:Universiti Sains Malaysia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Universiti Sains Malaysia was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: November 3, 2007

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Portal This article is part of WikiProject Universities, an attempt to standardise coverage of universities and colleges. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Malaysia. This project provides a central approach to Malaysia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Cleanup

I've cleaned up the article - I'm a bit unclear on whether I'm allowed to remove the speedy delete header or not, though. Johnleemk | Talk 12:46, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hello! I'm trying to improve the site in connection with a student project at USM (international student). It would be nice, if you don't make any changes until 23.3.06 22:00 pm. This to avoid editing conflicts. Thanks Dnydegger 12:20, 23 March 2006

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Unisainslogo4.JPG

Image:Unisainslogo4.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quick-failed Good Article nomination

Per the quick-fail criteria of the GA nominations process, I must fail this article forthwith without an in-depth review. This is because it lacks any references to reliable, published sources at all. Please review the GA criteria, and provide a References section that allows you to make citations to these references. Once this has been completed, you are welcome to renominate this article. If you feel this assessment was in error, you can request a reassessment. Thank you, VanTucky ^Talk 21:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)