Talk:UnitedHealth Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article is on a subject of High-importance within Minnesota articles.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Companies Portal This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Trivia and Situs

Question: I live in Minnesota and have United Healthcare as my health insurance. Doesn't this go against the "Trivia" section on how United isn't allowed to insure in MN?

Answer: You do not give your employer's name, however that employer is probably not "sitused" in Minnesota. Example: Your employer is sitused in Connecticut. The legal entity is UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (UHC). Your employer has employees in Connecticut and Minnesota. UHC needs to be licensed and appointed in Connecticut only. Also, UnitedHealthcare MN based employees have UHC insurance as they are Self-insured. Group29 18:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Biased

This article doesn't seem to suffer from undue POV. I recommend removing the biased tag.--Nowa (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll review it, but given the lack of specifics - if someone wants to label an article as having a POV problem, they really should explain why - I'm probably going to take the tag off. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if it's quite deserving of a POV tag, but it does read rather like an advertisement. Erik Carson (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)