Talk:Underwater panther

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
View comments (edit) Needs expansion and clarification (& citations) --Miskwito 00:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

An entry from Underwater panther appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 19 July 2006.

[edit] Image request

This image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wonderal/165250184/ has creative commons licensing status. Would that be appropriate? It is considered to be a pictograph of the "Underwater Panther" on the Canadian shore of Lake Superior. comments by 24.213.57.50

Unfortunately, no, that image is licensed under attribution-noncommercial 2.5. Since it can only be used in non-commercial situations, Wikimedia Commons won't allow it to be uploaded. --Miskwito 03:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I just added a photo that I took of a Mississippian ceramic from the Smithsonian. I also have another photo of another ceramic I can add. Furthermore, I can ask the photographer from Flickr if they would let us use that rock art photo cited above, if you all think it's appropriate to the article. Let me know, Madman 04:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The petroglyph would be appropriate, since it shows the typical rendition of a mishibizhiw. Being that it is a petroglyph, if you get premission, it may be a nice addition to the Petroglyph and Anishinaabe traditional beliefs articles as well. CJLippert 02:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Ask and you shall receive. Wonder Al changed the license. I cropped it a bit and uploaded it. I have yet to be turned down by a Flickr photog (although one didn't own the photo he uploaded!). Madman 01:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Excellent work, sir! --Miskwito 01:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Miskwito. Turns out that this was a pictograph (painting) and not a petroglyph (engraving), but it's still a nice addition. I also just now added a 3rd image of a "Underwater Panther/Great Serpent" bowl. Madman 03:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requires cleanup

There is no such thing as generic "native american" mythology. Nor is there a single "native american language" such as this article seems to assume. Native Americans are around 2000-4000 different ethnic groups with different religions and beliefs and languages. One giant error of the article is using words from a "native american" language without specifying which - please provide citations as to form which language the words are taken or the will be struck. Also it should be very clear throughout the article for exactly which indigenous peoples the mythological creature is documented. Someone please clean it up within a week or so or I will simply cut out the parts that seems to be saying something about generic "native americans".Maunus 12:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I reworded the opening paragraph a bit to hopefully make it less vague and all-encompassing, but I'm not familiar enough with mishi-bizhiw lore to know which specific tribes shared this mythology--whether it was only Algonquian peoples, or other Great Lakes tribes as well, and the extent of the tradition, and so on. The entire article needs cleaning up though; especially given the importance of underwater panthers, at least in Anishinaabe mythology. --Miskwito 03:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Gichi-anami'e-bizhiw = "the fabulous night panther"? "Great-spirit-lynx" seems a little more apt; the Freelang dictionary cited as the source of this translation says nothing of the sort even with a lot of creative interpretation. Panthers and lynxes are not even in the same genus, which seems to reflect in the language as bizhiw is lynx while mishi-bizhiig is a large feline (says Freelang and Nichols/Nyholm.) I'm not sure where "night" came in either. I might be misled about the anami'e particle, especially as anami'e and related particles seem to have more of a specifically Christian meaning. I'll defer to more experienced speakers, though.Chimakwa 21:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The term anami'e (ayami'e in Algonquin) and its variant anami'aa (ayami'aa) means "to be in a state of prayer/worship/reverence" (thus extended to mean "Christian" in majority of the communities), and I can guarantee you that the "the fabulous night panther" is the correct translation from the German to English, and the translation was also correct from the Ojibwe to French to German, but unfortunately, there is always a loss of meaning in the translation process so the Ojibwe to English (without the French and German in between), would yield "the greatly-revered lynx", but most people are familiar with "Kitchi-Gami: Life Among the Lake Superior Ojibway" by Johann Kohl (1859), which the English translation says just that: "the fabulous night panther". Since Wikipedia cites documentable sources, we are sort of stuck with the "lost in translation" name here. I suppose we can have a footnote added, on how the "the fabulous night panther" name translation was derived from the Gichi-anami'e-bizhiw. CJLippert 22:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. I see that Kohl is not cited. I think I shall flip tabs and add him on. CJLippert 00:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I tried to clean up the article a bit, and I honestly think it looks pretty good now. Nice footnotes, good references, nice images. Madman 01:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)