Template talk:Unblockabuse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TFD moved to Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_July_8#Template:unblockabuse.

Contents

[edit] Documentation

This template adds blocked user talk pages to Category:Protected from unblock requests.


This page is protected.

 Template:Unblockabuse is currently protected from editing.
To request a change to it, add {{editprotected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request.
Protection templates
v • d • e
{{pp-meta}} Full Semi
Dispute: {{pp-dispute}} N/A
Vandalism: {{pp-vandalism}} {{pp-semi-vandalism}}
High visibility templates: {{pp-template}} {{pp-semi-template}}
User talk of blocked user: {{pp-usertalk}} {{pp-semi-usertalk}}
Spambot target: N/A {{pp-semi-spambot}}
Sockpuppetry: N/A {{pp-semi-sock}}
Long-term: N/A {{pp-semi-indef}}
Generic (other protection): {{pp-protected}} {{pp-semi-protected}}
Scrutiny of the Office: {{pp-office}} {{reset}}
Move protection (disputes): {{pp-move}}
Move protection (vandalism): {{pp-move-vandalism}}
Create protection: {{pp-create}}
Talk page info: {{Permprot}} {{Temprot}}

[edit] Discussions

Add issues below as you see fit, sign with ~~~~

[edit] Category link

Any chance some admin can add a link to the category under a <noinclude>? As it stands, you can only get to the category by viewing source and noticing the category link there. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

We can do the documentation here (see above), is that good enough? -- Omniplex 08:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
I suppose that works. Would be nice to have a bit of documentation on the template page to the effect of "this template categorizes pages into XYZ", though. Zetawoof(ζ) 08:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
ACK, sooner or later (worst case two weeks) an admin will see your request. -- Omniplex 09:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Change made. --CBD 15:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Zetawoof(ζ) 19:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
New editprotected speed record :-) -- Omniplex 19:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rules need to be defined

As rules are added to this template, they also should be defined in the instructions for {{unblock}} so users of the targeted template know what the rules are. Someone just slapped this on User talk:RefBot when I asked for a second review when the first review didn't look at the actual block. And the second reviewer didn't review the actual block either. (SEWilco 17:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC))