Talk:Ukrainian Village, Chicago
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merger
- The following discussion is a concluded merger discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was No Consensus: (1 for, 1 against). No merger should take place as a result of this nomination. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 01:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I oppose because they are different things a Historic District in a neighborhood should have its own page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 20:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC).
- Merge - I'm not sure how they are different. To my understanding, Ukrainian Village, Chicago and Ukrainian Village District are one and the same entity. The neighborhood/district was given special status by the mayor, so to draw an artificial distinction is unnecessary, unless I am missing something. Further, whether a historical district in a neighborhood should have its page is a whole other issue. On the other hand, props on the work you're doing with landmarks in Chicago. --Riurik(discuss) 21:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is a concluded merger discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

