Portal talk:U.S. Roads
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] 2580 articles
Is that number still correct? I was managing stubs yesterday and we might have more than that. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be shocked if the actual number is now double that figure, honestly. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Headline of the netherlands motorways are all wrong
Because there is no portal for roads but only for US roads, I want to ask here: I would be thankful, if the road specialists could have a look here: Portal talk:Transport#Headline of the netherlands motorways are all wrong Thank you -- 84.132.101.93 10:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] U.S. Roads or North American Roads
In the early morning of September 21, I moved this page to Portal:North American Roads and enlarged the scope. (The portal currently reflects the expansion, despite the name.) My thought process was sparked by Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads#Possible "news" page?, where I was told that the portal needed a "steady maintainer". With the interconnectedness of North American roads, it seemed like a logical move. As other editors (presumably) woke up, they objected, and Rschen7754 started moving pages back in preparation to split. That explains the present state, left as a "compromise" to stop the threat of an edit war. --NE2 23:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
There seem to be three options:
- Change it back to U.S. Roads
- Keep it changed to North American Roads
- Split it into two portals
Please discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each below:
[edit] U.S. Roads only
- Advantages
- Status quo
- More of a focus can be placed on U.S. Roads
- Portal was adequately maintained by one familiar with the subject
- Disadvantages
[edit] North American Roads only
- Advantages
- Expands the scope so more people may be interested in helping
- Combines interconnected road systems
- Encourages improvement of Mexican and Canadian road articles
- This would happen under the third proposal as well...
- Not as much, especially if nobody cares to maintain a largely duplicate portal... --NE2 00:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why? Because CRWP would be piggybacking off the publicity of USRD? --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with projects. Portals are about subjects. --NE2 00:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why? Because CRWP would be piggybacking off the publicity of USRD? --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unless of course, consensus decided that it is time to elect a Project Lead team (ala WP:MilHist's example). Either just for CRWP or the entire portal project. Is that a "road worth traveling"? Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 14:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not as much, especially if nobody cares to maintain a largely duplicate portal... --NE2 00:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Disadvantages
- Groups the "crappy" Canadian Roads WikiProject with the supposedly better U.S. Roads WikiProject
- There are less than 20 Mexican road articles
- But it would create 'CookieTemplates' for them to draw ideas from when they do get larger
[edit] Both portals
- Advantages
- Supposedly a compromise
-
- Compromise to what? master sonT - C 00:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Between U.S. roads only and North American roads only. --NE2 00:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Compromise to what? master sonT - C 00:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Disadvantages
- Splits effort among two portals, when one was apparently not being maintained well
-
- I'm curious as to what's wrong with it that its not being maintained master sonT - C 00:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I echo Master_son's comments. The portal was maintained on a regular basis. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- So Scott5114 misspoke on WT:USRD? --NE2 02:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I believe so, TMF did keep the portal maintained. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- So should I start the "news" page? I have no interest in running a duplicate portal. (To avoid misunderstandings, I'm not saying I support moving it back; I'm just asking what the "USRD collective" thinks.) --NE2 02:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the USRD news page? --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm referring to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads#Possible "news" page?. I think there's merit in keeping track of road news without regard for national boundaries. --NE2 02:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Are you referring to the USRD news page? --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- So should I start the "news" page? I have no interest in running a duplicate portal. (To avoid misunderstandings, I'm not saying I support moving it back; I'm just asking what the "USRD collective" thinks.) --NE2 02:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I believe so, TMF did keep the portal maintained. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- So Scott5114 misspoke on WT:USRD? --NE2 02:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Go back to U.S. Roads only. I could support two portals, but under no circumstances should the USRD portal be merged into the NA portal. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- My preference: retain the U.S. road one, then create a generic road portal if necessary. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I saw no problems with the portal the way it was as the USRD portal. I think it should be moved back. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 22:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- It should remain as is - if someone wants to start a Portal:Canadian Roads I'm fine with that. But NA roads seems kind of silly. There's not even a NA Roads project. --Son 13:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep P:USRD as-is, since it seems clear that nobody likes the NA Roads idea. I'm all for a world roads (highways) portal, since there are hell lot more roads in the world, especially Canada and China. —O (说 • 喝) 23:18, 24 September 2007 (GMT)
- This portal never had any problems as it is - by renaming it - it becomes more prone to problems - and the portal's scope was well established already. Why fix something that isn't broken. That said - if CRWP wants a portal - they can create one. This one shall stay as is master sonT - C 03:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- clarification - this one shall be U.S. Roads master sonT - C 02:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've created Portal:Roads yesterday, with a scope set on roads around the world. This would be a child portal under the Roads portal. Comments? —O (说 • 喝) 00:05, 28 September 2007 (GMT)
I think that consensus should be pretty clear now. I'll move the portal over the next few days. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

