Talk:Tropical Storm Melissa (2007)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Tropical Storm Melissa (2007) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 17, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Hurricanes
 This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
Merge talk
 The possible merging of this article has been discussed by editors of the WikiProject.

I gave it start-class, but I think with some work, it could possibly reach B. Juliancolton (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)



Hey Julian. I'm reviewing this article and have put it on hold.

Well written:
Only problem is this typo:

Operationally, the storm briefly attained winds of 45 mph (75 km/h) late on September 29 as some satellite estimates showed a slightly stronger storm with deeper convection,[7]but in the pos-season analysis....


Factual accuracy:
Only problem here is the references here are missing:

The system lost its deep convection and by the afternoon of September 30, Melissa degenerated into a remnant low as thunderstorm activity diminished. After the circulation dissipated, the remnant low continued its general west-northwest track to the south of a rebuilding subtropical ridge in the central Atlantic.


Broadness : Pass

NPOV : Pass

Stability : Pass

Images : Pass


Those are the improvements necessary for GA.TheNobleSith (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I believe that I have addressed your concerns. If not let me know. Thanks, Juliancolton (Happy St. Patrick's day!) 18:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you addressed the concerns. Thanks. It is now a GA. Honestly, though, does this article meet notability guidelines?TheNobleSith (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! While it might not seem like the most notable storm, it meets the notability guidelines, at least for the WPTC. Juliancolton (Happy St. Patrick's day!) 18:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, just wondering. TheNobleSith (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)