Talk:Tropical Storm Lee (2005)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Lee (2005) article.
Article policies
Good article Tropical Storm Lee (2005) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Hurricanes
 This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.
Peer review
 This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.
Merge talk
 The possible merging of this article has been discussed by editors of the WikiProject.

[edit] Todo

I have added in advisory information (Dr Avila gets a quote again) and reformatted this article to make it similar to Irene's. A copyedit is needed but apart from there is nothing left to do. One thing I would like to mention though is the track map. I am aware that the shapes denote a different status to the system but at a glance that distinction isn't obvious. How about changing 'low' (and extratropical) data points to a much smaller triangle? --Nilfanion 14:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I can't think of anything else now.--Nilfanion 11:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I'd best hunt the MODIS pic (there is probably one...)--Nilfanion (talk) 10:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

I cannot believe that there is an article on the least notable storm... i mean i understand tammy and gamma and even jose but come on lee???--65.2.153.158 01:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

We have articles on all 2005 storms, just for simplicity. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
WOW!!! There is a heck of a lot of information about one very boring, insignificant cyclone. Pretty soon, we are all going to make articles about every single storm that existed in the planet! (RaNdOm26 16:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC))
LOL, don't worry, just articles for all storms for the Atlantic back to probably around 2000, though we haven't set a date. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
If anybody cares, I am very much opposed to that idea. I've lost count of how many times I've given my reasons for that but nobody ever seems to care. I just thought I'd through it out there for the sake of consistancy. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 04:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry Eric, but if there's info, then we can make the articles. In fact, there's probably enough info back to 1991 for all storm articles ;) However, there'd be too many fish storms, so 2000 is a tenative data for a project we haven't even started yet. Only 2004 has started all storms. --Hurricanehink (talk) 12:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)