Talk:Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
December 31, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

[edit] Merging histories?

With the long debate by Hmwith, he decided in the end to cut-and-paste...is there any way the histories can be merged? (Same with Jerry and Melissa once they get moved) CrazyC83 (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Todo

I'd like some info from StormCarib to be included (link). While it may not be official, it still provides some impact, which is not currently mentioned. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I added that. Juliancolton (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

When adding information, please make sure it flows with the article. --Hurricanehink (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I just wanted to add that in, and then make it better once I found more info. Juliancolton (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

GA it? Juliancolton (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

No. The lede is very awkward, and there are multiple typos. Please learn to more coherently, and try and spell-check your work ;) --Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I copy it, and then paste it on a spell checker on word perfect. It showed no mistakes. I will check again. Juliancolton (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

And just so I can learn better: what makes the lede awkward? Juliancolton (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Calling depressions by their numbers, saying that a tropical wave intensified into a tropical depression, phrases like on the 13. The whole becoming a depression first but storm later could be clearer. --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Any better? Juliancolton (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

GAC? Juliancolton (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

No. Please copyedit it. I counted several spelling and grammar errors. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Got it. Juliancolton (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Article's lead was consulted on IRC, User:Juliancolton fixed it. Thanks to him and CrazyC83, this article meets all criteria.^Mitch32^contribs 21:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)