Talk:Triticale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Agriculture This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Agriculture, which collaborates on articles related to agriculture. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Triticale is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Fictional triticales

"Fictional triticales" section is clearly irrelevant unless you can find many more examples. -antelopotamus

As opposed to one example that's widely known and culturally significant? Many people only know of triticale because of quadrotriticale.

Shouldn't the Star Trek section be in a 'Trivia' section? It's so out of place at the moment it's ridiculous... --211.28.219.156 04:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I

certainly don't want to cause more tribble than necessary; but, I've noticed that the parenthetic notes seem to be to the right of the periods. This can be somewhat confusng, particularly to those, like myself, who do not comprehend much of the words.

When the notes are too fuzzy, that can cause much tribble. It may even "start a wreck".

Thank You.

hopiakuta ; [[ <nowiki> </nowiki> { [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] } ;]] 08:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I can't make any sense out of this comment. Can anyone else? -Jarsyl 04:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nutrition information with comparisons

A section on nutrition information would be great, especially with comparisons to common grains. For example, protein, carbohydrates, fiber, etc. Edgriebel 14:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citing non-listed books in "Biology and genetics"

This article currently reads like someone's biology class essay. In a good way. Lots of (cited!) data and good flow. Because of this it's surprising that there are some major problems with the section "Biology and genetics." Most (all?) of the works cited in this section do not appear in the references section at the bottom of the page. I noticed this when I went to correct the obvious typo: "(Laibach, 925)," and couldn't find any listings for this author. How ought we to resolve this situation? I'd hate to delete the citations, but they're of no use without the full references. -Jarsyl 04:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Taxobox

Taxobox must be used ONLY for natural taxon. Triticale is an artificial hybrid. Meneguzzo 22:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)