Talk:Triple Entente

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

	Russia Portal Triple Entente is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Fix the bloody 3rd paragraph!

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. SushiGeek 20:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

this is an absolutely terrible article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.185.48.6 (talk • contribs). The preceding comment was moved from the top of the page. +A.0u 00:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

And for a second time...Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. +A.0u 00:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fix it soon!

Also the map is incorrect. Siam (Thailand) was allied with France, U.K. et. al. and its troops saw action on the western front. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.27.142.94 (talk • contribs) also BELGIUM was neutral in 1914 and got dragged into the war because the plan von schliefen called for a 'backdoor' attack on france via belgium.

Actually, the map depicts Belgium correctly; the caption states that the map refers to circumstances in 1915, not 1914. +A.0u 05:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] For shame

Wikipedia should be ashamed of such articles as this one. Some of the more idiotic statements:

• Russia was by far the largest of all the six European powers.

  The British Empire was larger and more populous by far.

• loans from France had helped Russia to develop some industry

  Ridiculous oversimplification. In economic terms, Russia was about as strong as France.

• Austria recently annexed most of Yugoslavia

  Please check when the term "Yugoslavia" came into being. If you need to refer to Bosnia and Herzegovina, there is no need to sport anachronistic terms.

Since Great Britain was the last to acceed to the concert and it was by no means the most vital member of the alliance, I suggest we discuss her at the bottom of the article, rather than at the top. --Ghirla^-трёп- 22:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)