Talk:Trinity of the Church Fathers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Contest speedy deletion

Gosh! I'm just trying to fix this page and the Trinity page to fulfill the criteria for acceptable articles. This deletion attack is coming too fast!! Said: Rursus ☻ 14:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

This just seems like a collection of quotations. Hardly encyclopedic. WWGB 14:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This is about the historical development of the concept of Trinity, which is regarded as central for many Christians (or often a defining feature of being Christian), and the main source of criticisms against Christianity from Islam and Judaeism. The speedy deletion would better be replaced with a heavy rewrite request to meet wikipedia standards, since that was my intention when moving the data from the Trinity article. Said: Rursus ☻ 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The speedy deletion note says:
It is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject.' (CSD A7) Speedy concern: It is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)
I say: it isn't. It's about a central christian principle/symbol set. Said: Rursus ☻ 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
And I'm working on it. Said: Rursus ☻ 14:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, fair enough. I will withdraw 'speedy deletion' tag and apply 'quotefarm' instead. WWGB 14:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much. You, know the original criticism against Trinity was about this quote farming, and if the article doesn't improve fast enough, I won't object against deletion, but first we'll see if it's possible to salvage it's content by adding some describing comments about the development of the term. Said: Rursus ☻ 14:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hopefully, this can be fleshed out. As it is, I'd prefer that this quotefarm be found on the main article, where it actually had some use.--C.Logan 21:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I find the quotes useful. I don't think they should be removed. --Observer99 (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)