Talk:Triangle of reference

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] What has happened??

I referenced the page "Semiotic Triangle", because it was a useful and informative page. Now I am redirected to this page which is at best a stub and at worst - well devoid of anything useful apart from some scattered references. Please please please reinstate the original page??? This re-direct is vandalism in my view. LookingGlass (talk) 12:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well at least I got the original diagram back! Thanks "mystery writer"! LookingGlass (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I support this view: Semiotic Triangle gets more Google hits than Triangle of reference.--EvenT (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

i have voiced the same concerns - the original article was pulled from wiki for undisclosed reasons by some 'special powers'. please put the original semiotic triangle page back again - or at least explain why it should not be in wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.218.47.16 (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)