User talk:Trezatium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Comment from User:24.86.210.203
I am a wikipedia neophyte. There is no question about that. I was however very concerned when I noticed that the main article didn't have much if anything to say about homosexuality and aids. Today I noticed that a user named "chicken wing" is proposing a change to the main article that would address these concerns. I also noticed that he is being taken seriously by at least 2 wikipedia pundits.
It is my contention that if people such as "chicken wing" had easy access to the Michael Fumento page they would find the task of convincing the aforementioned pundits that there is in fact ample evidence to support the notion that their is a strong correlation between homosexuality and aids. Mr Fumento has been arguing that very argument for years. Perhaps the time has come to email Mr Fumento himself and ask him to reveal his sources. But as you may know the Gay Community is often strongly at variance with any notion that might serve to undermined there agenda for more funding. 24.86.210.203 08:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate your concerns. I have posted a reply to your comment on the AIDS talk page. It would be helpful if you would confirm whether or not you (User:24.86.210.203) are the same as User:Randy Bugger. Thanks. Trezatium 19:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
It was me alright but I thought that I was signed in, SORRY about that. I am a slow typer. I got an error message telling me to try logging out and signing back in. In retrospect it is probably best to bracket the subject of Aids funding and the Gay Community . I have a lot of respect for them,Randy Bugger 12:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. No need to apologise. Trezatium 19:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AIDS FUNDING CHART
Do you think that a chart and or section on aids funding since its onset is a good idea. It is pertinent to the main article and I am surprised that one does not exist already. I think it should be done with discretion. It would also help negate any reasonable objection(s) from aids dissidents. Randy Bugger 11:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have no strong opinions on this (generally I don't do much editing to the main AIDS article). I suggest you start a discussion on the AIDS talk page. Trezatium 09:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AKA Randy Bugger
Hello my real name is Moses Weintraub. The user name Randy Bugger has been put to rest due to potential breach of Wikipedias user name policy. Moses Weintraub 10:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Feedback on NPOV
Hi - just wanted to let you know that another editor, on Duesberg hypothesis, criticized the article because the article merely contains an "abundance of references to how other people think it's wrong" (rather than my personal refutation). I can't think of a better (albeit inadvertent) endorsement of its progress toward satisfying WP:NPOV, so thought I'd share it. MastCell Talk 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added a comment to the discussion. Trezatium 09:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FLRC listing
I've listed Wikipedia:Featured_list_removal_candidates#List_of_HIV-positive_people. TONY (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
