Talk:Trapt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, an attempt to improve articles related to heavy metal music. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Heavy Metal because it uses a stub template.
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
|
Trapt is hardly Nu Metal, they are mainstream rock, I am just going to make a few changes
if you listen to their older material, it sounds more Nu metal, but i agree, their sound is different now.
Trapt is possibly the best new age rock band. Their sound has matured over time.
That is true they really have matured over time they sound great. ive listend to bolth there CDs and there really good the first is better though my opion.
The second album definatly shows maturity. it shows maturity yes but the first shows there manlyness
Contents |
[edit] Eugh!
"The band chose their name because they felt trapped by their upper middle-class Bay Area town and privileged upbringing. The alternate spelling of "Trapped" represents their rebellious ways."
awww-- Follow Up: Wahhh, Cry me a river children. *
- Yeah, I'm sure they'd feel more liberated in a bedsit. Except they've become wealthier. Hmmmm --Onias 22:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
man f u there good no matter how wealthy or poor they can have the same freaking feelings wheather rich or poor
[edit] .
- I hardly think that one changed letter is in any way "rebellious". There are numerous other bands that have similar names (Staind comes first to mind). I'm deleting that until someone has a better reason to leave it in.--Swuster 21:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Right. The idea of being 'trapped' and breaking free..and them finding 'freedom' in music, or however you want to say it..not a letter change.
[edit] Rewrote article
I've rewritten most of the article to stop it sounding like an advert, and I've also added a couple of citations. Let me know what you think. H4cksaw 12:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd like more information brought to the article's proverbial table altogether; there is a lot missing here, and the article needs to be guided in the right direction.
That being said, I believe H4cksaw's revision is beginning that guidance, and support it. .Absolution. 10:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Official site directs to Myspace
The official site now directs to their Myspace page, so i'm going to remove the "Trapt's official site" link, but im pretty sure the site will be back up once their new album is out.
btw do you think its worth mentioning their tracks "Lost in a portrait" from The Punisher soundtrack or "Perfect Dream"? ^_^ ReVOLv3R 06:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I've seen other pages that do, so why not? :) I have a lot of unreleased, independent Trapt songs, I can add to the titles to the list when it's made.
[edit] no real sense
i know trapt is definately HARD rock...but when did they become metal? look at the wikipedia thingy at the top of the page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Inuxshinedown (talk • contribs) 01:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC).
That's there because they fall into a subgenre of "heavy metal" I guess..I don't know. I suppose it fits
[edit] Trapt Singles
Who the fuck keeps adding singles to the Trapt page which dont exist, are never played on the radio or dont have music videos. Fucking faggots shit pieces fuck you dont screw with Trapt...and dont add any false info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.120.225.195 (talk) 22:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
WHO THE HELL REMOVED THOSE SINGLES YOU BETTER F OFF. SHITS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.120.225.195 (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ahem. Quite. Your edits were reverted by myself and Obscurans because they removed valid information. You might want to take a look at this link for proof that they were indeed released as singles. -Panser Born- (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ok, fine. But there isnt Lost Realist. And none of them have music videos, hmm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.120.225.195 (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You do have a point about Lost Realist — I think someone slipped that in quite recently, I certainly haven't noticed it until now. I'll remove it for now, at least until someone else can provide evidence to the contrary. I've no idea whether any of them have music videos or not, but neverthless, even if they don't, they still qualify as singles. -Panser Born- (talk) 23:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
-
Ok, thats fair
They don't have music videos to them, nor are they singles. Trapt also usually announces their singles :) AllAroundMe 07:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lost Realist
It is a single, just check out iTunes and there is in fact an "album" titled "Lost Realist - Single." Hope this clears things up.
[edit] Location
Unless someone can come up with a source that the band now resides in Vancouver, I'm removing it.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Trapt 2005.jpg
Image:Trapt 2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
