Talk:Transparency (humanities)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Style
the article reads as if it were written by a 5-year old. many parts are either redundant or confusing. furthermore, there seem to be no references on this page, which makes the article look like original research. --141.35.179.94 15:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I'd have to pretty much agree with the above statement, some work is needed.--66.82.9.85 (talk) 23:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Transparency in USA
President Bush is a member of the secret society Skull and Bones. The main problem with skull and bones is that it is a closed secret society. Therefore one can only speculate about that for which they stand. The symbol they use has been used in the past by pirates (theives). This does not enhance their image. They are so secretive that even presidential candidates give their allegence to the society before the american people; therefore they will not discuss what they society stands for or what ideologies they embody.
Our country makes a big deal about being an open, transparant society, but how open and transparent can it be, if our leaders pledge their allegence to secret societies?
BmikeSci 07:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)BMIKESCI
[edit] Tranparency in the EU
The Philippines is not a liberal democracy.
It strikes me that the Transparency in the EU section of this peice is first of all POV and second of all would be better placed on the European Union article rather then the Transparency article. I would like to hear what others think. Jboday
I absolutely agree. Transparency at the EU certainly is an issue that would easily fill an article on its own, but of course it is very complex, and should encompass much more information, than just a political opposition to the EU constitution. Regards Olivia Summer
[edit] Neutrality?
Article appears to make various subjective judgments about the issue of transparency, i.e. how it affects the significance of elections and democracy. --Wykypydya (talk) 05:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
This is so bad that it either needs to be completely rewritten or deleted. Ehusman (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
