Talk:Transfer RNA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
what does the primary structure look like? Pelirojopajaro 05:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- The article does describe it, specific sequences are not given since there are numerous tRNA sequences. In general (in the article) it is a small RNA chain (73-93 nucleotides), for more details look at the features section. If you check out the link Sprinzl tRNA compilation, you can get a list of 1000s of tRNAs, Hichris 16:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
the term "degenerate" is not used correctly. Active contributor 02:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure what you mean, just looking quickly at the history it looked fine. In this context, degenerate means "having more than one codon representing an amino acid; also being such a codon" Hichris 13:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or does that merge suggestion seem quite weird? Sakkura 22:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm guessing someone saw a stub article and thought that integrating it into the tRNA entry would "fix the stub"....not realizing the enormity of the situation. -- MarcoTolo 11:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Psyched-out Biology Groupie Seeks Help
I am a non-biologist, but have some crude idea of the function of transfer RNA, from reading popular accounts of protein biosynthesis. The subject is correctly marked as of high importance, yet at present I can understand the first sentence of the article and practically nothing else. It's enough to make me turn to Creationism - I can understand that. Could the technicalities please be postponed, and the article given a proper introduction, with suitable links? A suitably expanded version of the 'History' section should probably come soon after the Introduction: at any rate, it should appear before the specialist material.
[User:Rwb001 10:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)]
[edit] frweaf
rggreg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.150.55.176 (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

