Talk:Trafalgar class submarine

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military technology and engineering task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	British military history task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B	rated as B-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

I removed the following as with submarines (submerged) displacement is purely a factor of size, so isn't remarkable:

but the increased displacement of around 800 tons suggests that a significant amount of extra equipment has been added.

Dan100 15:26, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

But increased size gives increased volume which means more space to put extra equipment in. Any time a warship's displacement is increased it is because they have added more equipment to the design. They don't make them bigger just for fun, you know. BobThePirate 19:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)