Talk:Trace italienne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] redundancy?

seems to be a lot of overlap between this and star fort; should they be combined? 67.68.235.106 19:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think that trace italienne refers more to the style rather than the actual construction. Its the more technical term for the technique.Peregrine981 21:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge proposal

I propose to merge the articles Bastion fortress, Star fort, and Trace italienne. These 3 articles discuss the exact same thing! In stead of 3 fragmented articles, the combined info could be very comprehensive. I suggest merging the info to Bastion fortress: it seems to me as the most fitting title. -- P199 17:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Trace italienne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] redundancy?

[edit] Merge proposal

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search