Talk:Toy Biz v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know if anyone is interested, but there was a discussion about whether the Supreme Court would uphold the sorts of actions taken in X-Men 3, and I responded by citing this case. The whole conversation is pretty funny, if you ask me. Dave (talk) 06:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Interesting, yeah. Thanks for sharing. —Nightstallion (?) 09:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Last link in References ("Is Wolverine human? A judge answers no") is broken. --70.231.227.194 23:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Of course they are not human.

They diverged from Homo sapiens,retaining humanoid appearance.(Homo sapiens superior according to Xmen) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.228.243.145 (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] This is the funniest thing I've ever heard

I'm not sure what's more ludicrous.. toy manufacturers trying to circumvent tax law, tax laws treating one toy differently from another, the fact that it worked, or the fact that the comics folk cared...