Talk:Tony Hendra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

User HenryHolt is apparently an employee of publisher Henry Holt. He wrote the following in the summary accompanying his upload of the cover of Tony Hendra's book, The Messiah Of Morris Avenue:

(This image is to the jacket cover of Tony Hendra's new novel. I am an employee of the company and if you have any questions or concerns please e-mail me at (removed for privacy reasons) The image is also available on our website: http://www.henryholt.com/mess)[1]

I have just emailed him at that address referring him to some relevant Wikipedia policies regarding the repeated edits he's been making to several Tony Hendra-related articles. Basically, he's purging relevant, sourced, NPOV information about criticisms of and controversies regarding Hendra. That's bogus. Wikipedia is not his publisher's marketing channel. It's a shared resource, and he is peeing in the well. Here's the email I sent him:

Hi. Several of us now have had to take time to correct your edits of Tony Hendra-related articles at Wikipedia. Your actions there are contrary to the policies of the site. I refer you to the following pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial_%28Keep_in_mind%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_tutorial
If you are willing to contribute information to the site in the spirit of Wikipedia, that's great, and to the extent you're willing to do that I applaud you. But it is important for you to realize that the site is not a private marketing channel of Henry Holt, or any other company. It is a community resources, and those of us who have contributed to the site over time will resist efforts to weaken its content. My guess is that overall, Henry Holt will be better served by working in tandem with the other users of Wikipedia and following the site's policies, rather than by violating those policies in an attempt to turn the site into a commercial for the company's products.
John Callender
jbc@west.net

We'll see if that does any good. -- John Callender 14:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

John, nice work. I agree that the edits removing the allegations are POV and thus against policy, i have been keeping an eye on them myself. However, i removed the editor's name and email address from your comment above, its generally not considered good form to publically reveal identifying information about editors without their permission. Rockpocket 16:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Gotcha. Sorry about that. For what it's worth, I was just quoting from the message he posted himself in the Edit summary when he uploaded the image of the book's dust jacket.

He replied to my email, saying (in part) the following:

The information that I had deleted reflected Tony in a negative and slanderous way. If he had admitted that he had done it, then I wouldn't touch it but since he consistently denies the claim, it should not be there.

I responded that I disagreed with his interpretation about whether the information should be included, and encouraged him to post his reasons here if he still wanted to remove it. He was generally very reasonable, making me regret my high-handed comments about peeing in the well and all. So hopefully this will all work out.

One aspect of this that's kind of interesting to me is the way he chose to register as his username HenryHolt, the name of the company division he works for (albeit the name of an actual person, the founder of the company, who died in 1926). In that sense, it's sort of like a role account, rather than an individual user account, which might tend to get kind of confusing if more than one person at the company was going to use the account. It wasn't like he was trying to hide it, since he identified himself by name and email (and explicitly solicited feedback) in his edit summary when he uploaded the dust jacket image. I wonder if that sort of thing is going to become more commonplace as Wikipedia grows, and more commercial companies concern themselves with its content. -- John Callender 23:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, i never realised HenryHolt had volunteered that information previously. In that case there probably isn't a problem, but its often best to keep email addresses off of wikipedia pagesas much as possible anyway, if only to stop him getting snowed under in spam. Of course, he is incorrect in his assertion that the material is slanderous in itself. We are not doing anything other than documenting the public record (she accused him, he denied it - both facts). If the editor wishes to pursue the issue, he should indeed post here to justify why it is slanderous. The article does have slightly more 'negative' info about Hendra than most minor bios though, compared to 'positive' facts. That is not inherently wrong if those are the principle reasons for his notability. I'm not really familiar enough with him to judge, but perhaps expansion on his positive contributions would not go amis.
In terms of his username, well, there is examples of individuals who edit on behalf of corporate and political organisations, in attempt to 'manage' information. However, there is nothing inherently wrong with some one from his publisher editing his article as long as they keep it factual, others do it to the benefit of all involved. I'll add the editor to my watchlist just to be sure their contributions remain in good faith and within policy. Rockpocket 01:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anthony Hendra's edit

I just reverted a series of edits by user User:Anthonyhendra, who I'll assume is the actual person the article is about. There was a fair amount of useful information in the addition, but it was overlong and fairly POV, amounting to a copy-and-pasted version of a publicity bio, apparently. Interestingly, the user put all the new material at the top of the article, and followed it by several pages of return characters, having the effect of pushing the original version of the article way down the page. An interesting approach to de-emphasizing the existing material, but not consistent with Wikipedia editing policies.

Anyway, I intend to take a look at the new material, and see what might be taken from it for the article. Anyone else who wants to do that is encouraged to do so as well.

For User:Anthonyhendra, the following resources are recommended:

Thanks. --John Callender 16:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi again John (and Anthony). There is some good material in that bio posting from Anthony, if it could be teased out in a NPOV manner and accurately sourced. If i get a chance over the next week or so, i'll see what i can do to incorporate it. If Anthony could provide the source of this info, that would be very helpful also. Rockpocket 17:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other Projects

Was he not involved in producing parody newspapers? I seem to remember "Not the New York Times," "Not the Wall Street Journal," a parody on the New York Post, and one of the National Enquirer (in which he called himself "Tonioso Hendra" on the masthead). I am going by memory, so I'll leave it to others who may have kept copies to add to the article proper. Eddieuny 04:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)