Template talk:Tom Clancy games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] italics

Why does this template need to be written in italics? It's really hard to read on my browser--3000zebs-(talk to me) 18:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template incomplete

In my opinion the list, is wether complete nor logic. Some Add-Ons are featured, but not all. Why has half of the Add-Ons got an own article, and the other half hasnt? Every Add-On that already has an own article, should get a link in here, and maybe the Add-Ons that haven't should get one, too.

This are the Add-Ons I mean:

Rainbow Six 1 + 1 Add-On
Rainbow Six 2 + 3 Add-Ons
Rainbow Six 3 + 2 PC-Add-Ons + 1 Console Add-On

Ghost Recon + 1 Add-On + 2 more Add-Ons


I am no coder, so my try looks a bit weird:

v • d • e
Tom Clancy games
Rainbow Six: Rainbow Six (Eagle Watch) • Rogue Spear (Urban Ops, Black Thorn, Covert Ops) • Raven Shield (Athena Sword, Iron Wrath, Black Arrow) • Lockdown • Critical Hour • Vegas
Ghost Recon: Ghost Recon (Desert Siege, Island Thunder, Jungle Storm) • Ghost Recon 2 (Summit Strike) • Advanced Warfighter • Advanced Warfighter 2
Splinter Cell: Splinter Cell • Pandora Tomorrow • Chaos Theory • Essentials • Double Agent • Conviction
Other: Politika • Ruthless.com • The Sum of All Fears • Shadow Watch • The Hunt for Red October


--ChrisJG 11:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EndWar

Should EndWar be another section, like rainbow six, ghost recon, and splinter cell? J-stan Talk 21:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

no - as soon as it becomes a new series/franchise it will get its own section, but it might end up as a flop which could lead to discontinuation of the Story. That'd basically throw it into the Others section again. Leave in there for now. --ChrisJG 10:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Takedown - Missions in Korea

Should I leave it out of the infobox? Ominae 01:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)