Talk:Tom Tancredo presidential campaign, 2008
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Good article review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
See above b (MoS):
See above notes.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
Good work on the article. A few more pictures wouldn't hurt, and that References 29 and 30 need fixing, but these are minor issues.Mitch32contribs 23:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

