Talk:Tokka and Rahzar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is Rahzar really a wolf? He looks more fox-like
Why was it necessary for Perry to alter the mutagen to make them infantlike? The first movie shows that when the baby turtles were mutated, they started out infantlike too. Depending on whether or not Perry really was an Utrom, he may or may not have known that, but nevertheless... Rahzar was clearly a young wolf before and after his mutation (or hell, maybe a fox, I dunno) and even if Tokka was an adult turtle (they mature pretty slowly) it'd still take quite a while for intelligence to occur.
Tokka and Rahzar are product of excellorated mutation. Rahzar was really a wolf...altho' it would appear to interestingly exaggerated compared to more traditional designs I've seen say of werewolves. I do see the "Fox" connection as his fur takes on a reddish hue. The mutagen Perry used on the creatures was tainted and served to poison their mutation. This was done to reduce the threat they would have posed had the excelloration of the mutating process had proceeded without the poison. Though it created issues with their intelligence. In the movie they remained brutish but entirely devoted to Shredder (their surrogate mother ). While the characters may not have been babies in their non-mutant form. They were still quite young in the animal forms. As mutants... they really were babies. At least in the movies. The animated versions were much more coherent with little connection to Shredder other than the fact that it is stated that Saki left some mutagen in the Zoo which apparently created Tokka and Rahzar in the Toon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TOkKa (talk • contribs) 17:19, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
