Talk:Tohir Yo‘ldosh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tohir Yo‘ldosh article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
WikiProject Central Asia Tohir Yo‘ldosh is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Central Asian portions of Iran and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

[edit] Discussion please?

I don't understand why the paragraph I added about the BBC's report that Yuldeshev tried to warn the USA prior to the attacks of 9-11 was excised. Could we have a discussion about this? Isn't the BBC an authoritative, verifiable source?

Putting the "(also transliterated as...)" in italics is, I believe, standard wikipedia style.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 03:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

But the paragraph is still there... and in your edit summary you said you added a reference, but it is the same reference... am I missing something..? KazakhPol 03:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. I think so.. Take a look at the second yellow block in this link, the paragraph after "line 6". It is gone.
Cheers! -- Geo Swan 06:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Meaningful edit summaries?

Someone made a big excision without offering an explanation. I am going to leave a note on their talk page asking them to return here and explain themselves.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

It was a copyright violation of this blog. I thought it was clear, since the site was linked in the revision, but my apologies if I caused any trouble. I should probably delete the relevant edits though. Cheers, CP 21:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)