Talk:Tobacco BY-2 cells

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The WikiProject's current monthly collaboration is focused on improving Restriction enzyme.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of mid-importance within molecular and cellular biology.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Tobacco BY-2 cells is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
This article may be too technical for a general audience.
Please help improve this article by providing more context and better explanations of technical details to make it more accessible, without removing technical details.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tobacco BY-2 cells article.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] Requested move

Nicotiana tabaccum cv. BY-2Tobacco BY-2 cellsRationale:Tobacco BY-2 cells is ususal and proper description, Nicotiana tabaccum cv. BY-2 was my own early mystake, as the (format is suitable for one particular list) and is not used very often and with even different spelling. (should be Nicotiana tabacum instead ... tabaccum) (Tobacco BY-2 cells is now used as redirect) -User:Reo On18:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

[edit] Result:moved

Done, makes sense, even without discusssion here. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)