Talk:Tiszaeszlár blood libel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 WikiProject Religion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page.


Tiszaeszlár blood libel is part of WikiProject Judaism, a project to improve all articles related to Judaism. If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Judaism articles.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

hello

i know nothing about this period, but it seems clear that this article is very POV.

wishfish


Comment:

This article is not written in a NPOV!


A little POV, e.g. it is a rather weak argument that nobody has claimed the body, so it was surely the girl's body; also, her mother has explicitly stated it wasn't her. Frigo 00:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This article is shamefully POV. Kossuth "raised his powerful voice", on June 17 the last act "in this shameful affair had begun". Móric "fully redeemed his past" etc. etc. in absurdum. I'm slapping a big fat tag on this, and hope some committed wikipedian can filter out the unbalanced choice of words.