User:Tintin1107/Editor Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following questions are offered as a guide for reviewers. Reviewers are free to use as few or many of the questions below as they want, and are free to review editors in areas other than those listed below.

Edit categorization summaries:

  • Are major and minor edits marked correctly?
  • Does the editor always include edit summaries, at least in major edits?
  • Are edit summaries informative?
  • Are edit summaries civil?

Reverts and vandalism

  • Are reverts done only for obvious vandalism or errors?
  • When a vandalism is reverted, does the editor post a warning on the user page?
  • Are warnings appropriate (follow WP:BITE, escalating)
  • Are vandal reported at WP:AIV when appropriate?

XfDs:

  • Has the editor participated in XfDs in the last two months? If so, were comments helpful rather than just "me to" or "I like it"? Was policy cited to support positions?
  • If the editor has participated in XfDs in the last two months, were the comments helpful rather than just "me to" or "I like it"? * Was policy cited to support positions? Was any citation reasonable and helpful?
  • In any AfD discussions, did the user try to improve articles being assessed in cases where he/she proposed that they be kept?

Talk pages (non-vandalism):

  • Are postings to user talk pages informative and civil?
  • Are postings to article talk pages civil and constructive?
  • Is discussion of the behavior of other editors kept off article talk pages?

Controversy and criticism:

  • If the editor received negative comments on his/her user talk page in the past six months, has he/she responded appropriately?
  • Except for obvious vandalism, has the editor archived comments on his/her user talk page rather than deleting them?
  • If the editor has participated in any mediation or RfCs in the past six months, was his/her behavior there, and the behavior discussed there, appropriate? (If not, did he/she apologize and commit to improvements?)

* Has the editor done a lot of rote edits (particularly posting "welcome" notices") that might be seen as trying to increase edit counts?

Participation in the Wikipedia community: