Talk:Time vortex (Doctor Who)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Rose and the Vortex
I think the comment about Rose exposing herself to the vortex is incorrect. She exposed herself to the heart of the TARDIS, which is not the same thing. Konczewski 03:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- From the episode dialogue —
- ROSE: I looked into the TARDIS. And the TARDIS looked into me.
- THE DOCTOR: You went deeper than that. You looked into the Time Vortex. Rose, no one's meant to see that —
- And later, after he reabsorbs the power:
- THE DOCTOR: I absorbed all the energy of the Time Vortex. And no one's meant to do that. Every cell in my body is dying.
- The shooting script also makes reference to the time vortex in either Rose or the Doctor's eyes in different scenes. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 03:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I just rewatched the episode, but couldn't get here fast enough to correct myself.Konczewski 10:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- So, what is the conclusion? We know that Rose looked into the heart of the TARDIS and the Doctor told her that in doing so she looked into the Time Vortex. Therefore is it true to say that the Time Vortex exists within the heart of the Tardis? Or perhaps the TARDIS contains a small part of the Time Vortex? Or maybe the heart of the TARDIS is simply a window on the Time Vortex? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 19:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I just rewatched the episode, but couldn't get here fast enough to correct myself.Konczewski 10:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Unprotected" travel in the Vortex
There are a number of examples of Timelords travelling without the aid of a TARDIS, but these could just be projections. There is the case at the beginning of Genesis of the Daleks where the CIA operative hands teh Doctor a Time Ring. Also, there is an example in the Pertwee era of a timelord appearing out of thin air (I forget the episode). We also have Bilis Manger in the series one finale of "Torchwood" --Taras 208.196.60.42 (talk) 22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:DW20051x13PartingOfWays1301.jpg
Image:DW20051x13PartingOfWays1301.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

