Talk:Time For Kids
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think we should delete this article, I've already placed it on the main Time Magazine article. --BlueGlowGuardian 03:36, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Well you could try WP:AFD if you feel strongly about it. Deathawk 16:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Whaddaya mean we should delete it!!!!!????? Time for Kids is TFK and TFK is the cornerstone of the world. Delete it?????!!!!!!! You've got to be crazy. If we deleted this, we'd have to delete every article in Wikipedia!!!! Then we'd have to bury all of the Time For Kids in the the ground with a funeral ceremony.
If this page were deleted, millions and billions of mothers and fathers and aunts and uncles and children and brothers and warriors and cows and horses and other magazines would all start weeping like mad magazines. And if that happened, then every being on earth would have to subscribe to Mad Magazine. Then everyone would lose way too much money. Then, once all the politicians stole it, there would be no money left.
If there was no money, all casinos would collapse and Nevada would disappear. If Nevada disappeared, there would be a humongous hole in the US that people would fall through when they were trying to get to California. Then California wouldn't have as many visitors and it would be less popular. If California was less popular, then Oregon would be too.
So you see there is no way we can delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.228.97 (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Excuse me, sir, what are you smoking?
Excuse me, but I would like to add my two cents to this discussion. If you don't mind, I would like to say that I find it very hard to believe that anybody could write what is written before this in their right mind. That prompts me to ask you what you are smoking. Drugs are a very terrible problem in this world and they must be stopped. There are rehab centers across the nation that I am sure would welcome you with open arms.
So, in closing, with your health in mind, I will ask you to try very hard to stop taking drugs.
Sincerely, Dr. Anderson J. Kirkpatrick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.179.134 (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I am Unbelievably Insulted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I turn on my computer and go to Wikipedia to find that some idiot has claimed I take drugs. Listen, Doc Andreson Kirkpatrick or Doc Anderson KirkQuacktrick if you prefer, I was trying to make a joke. Do you even know what a joke is? I thought nobody who used Wikipedia lacked that kind of basic understanding of the world. Apparently you do. If only Wikipedia could have an IQ test to see who fails to pass and then lock them out. I would love to see you locked out.
Since you signed your dumb name, I'll sign mine to if you want. Yeah I'll sign it and you'll treat me like a king now.
D.J. Bailey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.179.134 (talk) 18:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ridiculous!
The last time I checked Wikipedia was an advanced reference source. But you are making it into a pigsty with your utter garbage on this discussion page. You say that Dr. Anderson Kirkpatrick should be banned but in reality you yourself are making me almost vomit. Stop wasting your time on ridiculous rants on the discussion page.
-John Trumbull —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.179.134 (talk) 02:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] What??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
I quickly checked the discussion page of this article to make sure my idiotic new aquatence who should be locked out, as I've already said, hasn't added to his Bleeping @$%* on the discussion. Thankfully he hasn't, but some other oaf of the same severly limited intelligence posted something so dumb I was shocked it wasn't written by Doc Quack. Are you guys all ganging up on me becaus eI'm short? Is it cause I'm a midget? Did you ever stop to think that just because I'm 5 feet tall, it doesn't mean my brain is off on vacation in some other frickin galaxy like you two's. Now leave me alone. This is my discussion page.
D.J. Bailey
