From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Languages, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, and easy-to-use resource about languages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
|
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
[edit] Shouldn't this be titled Nehalem language?
As I understand it Tillamook is the Chinookan name for these people, who in their own language were the Nehalem (tribe) (already on the Nehalem dismabiguation page). Wouldn't it be "ethnologically correct" to call them by their own name, rather than by somebody else's name for them?Skookum1 16:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nonsense
The "rounded" consonants, including /w/, are not labialized—the effect is created entirely inside the mouth by cupping the tongue.
This sentence is completely meaningless, what is it supposed to mean? Are they really rounding their tongues when speaking?