From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't it be 3CCD? Does anyone say three-D or three-G? Google gives 7K hits for Three-CCD vs. 3M for 3CCD... --Adoniscik (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's typical to use full names, not the most common abbreviations. Dicklyon (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree, Three-CCD seems rather clumsy. As long as 3CCD redirects to the right place I don't mind so much.
[edit] 3ccd vs. ccd
[edit] CYGM More Sensitive?
A 23 July 2007 edit by Kosin123 claims "A single-chip image sensor using CYGM filter is more sensitive than a three-CCD sensor though." Are there any references that support this? It seems very counterintuitive. Kime1R (talk) 02:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's certainly not correct in general; it's possible some particular pair of devices compared that way. Let's take it out. Dicklyon (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)