Talk:Three-CCD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

[edit] Title

Shouldn't it be 3CCD? Does anyone say three-D or three-G? Google gives 7K hits for Three-CCD vs. 3M for 3CCD... --Adoniscik (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

It's typical to use full names, not the most common abbreviations. Dicklyon (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, Three-CCD seems rather clumsy. As long as 3CCD redirects to the right place I don't mind so much.

[edit] 3ccd vs. ccd

  • advantages over ccd ?

[edit] CYGM More Sensitive?

A 23 July 2007 edit by Kosin123 claims "A single-chip image sensor using CYGM filter is more sensitive than a three-CCD sensor though." Are there any references that support this? It seems very counterintuitive. Kime1R (talk) 02:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

It's certainly not correct in general; it's possible some particular pair of devices compared that way. Let's take it out. Dicklyon (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)