Talk:Thomas J. Fiscus/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article reads as though Thomas Fiscus wrote it. Except for the first couple of sentences, it is pure poppycock.

The website cited as providing the "other side" of the Fiscus story contains pure, unadulterated nonsense. Additionally, contrary to the article's claim, the Fiscus matter did not come to light around the same time as Michael D. Murphy. The Murphy case came to light well after Fiscus retired under a cloud. Fiscus claiming that the Murphy case in some way prejudiced his own is rediculous. On the other hand, Murphy, currently scheduled for Court Martial, may well pay for Fiscus' sins. The senior officers who sit on the Murphy panel (or the judge alone) is quite likely to have had quite enough of AF Senior JAGs behaving poorly.

This former two star general had female subordinates sleeping with him and affectionately calling him such things as "homey." Enough said, he should have been court-martialed. His shameless website, cited in the article, is an indication that he remains ethically challenged.64.148.255.16 (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)