Talk:Thomas E. Klocek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I tried to add a little more information, I will add some more backround info, and info about the issue tommorow.
___________________________________________________________________________
I added some more info to the aftermath section and will continue updating this page.
I corrected a grammatical error in the section titled Kloceks views.
I also added the quotation mark to the title: Klocek's views
[edit] Some editing
Did some editing: punctuation, capitalization, grammar, made the links look better, made quotes from the article flow smoother in the text, added one link, removed the picture section (there was no picture linked), and combined both "external links" sections into one. I tried to make sure no URLs actually showed: it looks very ugly. If someone thinks I should add more links from conservative blogs, portraying their perspective or statements, I can. Kitabparast 23:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia article. This is propaganda, and should be either removed, or improved. And putting in things from a conservative blog is just as silly as putting things in from a marxist blog.
Yeah this feels almost like Klocek wrote this himself.

