User talk:TheQuaker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, TheQuaker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 01:45, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board
Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] question
I saw that you are a conservative Wikipedian. Would you like to join Conservapedia as a editor? Conservapedia is looking for good editors and Admins. Please send me your email if you want to join Conservapedia. If you feel reticient about giving out your email address you can simply create a new account at hotmail and yahoo so you don't risk getting a lot of junk mail. Regional123 01:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Regional123
[edit] Tir na nOg
I hope you don't take it personally. To answer your question, for one thing, trivia sections in articles should be avoided. Second, the material wasn't sourced, and didn't think it was notable enough to be included, since neither the song nor the album it's on have an article. Nothing against the band, but almost invariably whenever we have sections devoted to trivia or popular culture in articles like this they fill up with references from modern times, even if the subject is hundreds of years old. This doesn't make for a good encylopedia article.--CĂșchullain t/c 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

