Talk:Theodor Billroth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Article quality
Something has to be done about the layout of this article. It is poorly divided, it needs copyediting, and the images are poorly placed. --evrik (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree. I don't see much point in adding section headers to an article which is less than 600 words and has been rated as a stub. When the article grows to 1000 words it might be worth dividing it up into sections.
- I also don't see any pressing need for copyediting. Do you see errors of grammar or syntax? Structure? I don't.
- The whole article is half a page long and there are two graphics. How else would you place them?--Ravpapa (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
You are right. I was wrong.
But why do you insist on wikilinking avocation? There is no article on avocation. Are you planning to write one? --Ravpapa (talk) 06:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles with listas parameter | Science and academia work group articles | Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles | Low-priority biography (science and academia) articles | Science and academia work group articles needing infoboxes | Biography articles without infoboxes | Start-Class biography articles

