Talk:The Woods (album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
[edit] Heavy clipping
Heavy clipping and limiting. Is it appropiate to write that the mastering of this album also is a departure towards a more commercially compatible loud sound?
- I agree.
and finds them moving towards a denser, heavier sound, clearly owing debt to classic rock acts such as Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath.
- This sentence is problematic. The sound of the classic Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath albums is a lot different from what we hear on The Woods. While the former have superb mastering and clean sound with a high dynamic range, later is quite the opposite of that: clippressed, limited dynamic range and a lot of distortion because of destructive mastering.--Pettsams 14:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] iTunes Version
Somebody should mention something about the iTunes version and how it has a live version of "The Fox" and a bonus track "Everybody".
