From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to children's and young adult literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project.
|
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Tasks you can do:
WikiProject Children's Literature Open Tasks
|
 |
Update: Author Biography articles and write about new books written for children
Expand: articles in the Demonata series by Darren Shan
Create new articles relating to Children's Literature
Add this template ( {{Children'sLiteratureWikiProject}} ) to the talk pages of articles relating to Children's Literature.
Expand and Edit Portal:Children and Young Adult Literature
Cooperate with Wikipedians belonged to similar WikiProjects
Discuss matters involving Children's literature on this wikiproject's talk page
Cleanup the Philip Ardagh article.
|
|
[edit] Summary
Ugh! That summary looks like a 5th grader wrote it!--74.224.206.55 03:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I again appeal that someone who has read the book has another look at this, and maybe condenses it if possible? I haven't read it, so I wouldn't know if that's applicable. Also, the summary needs a grammar cleanup! Model201 (talk)
This sentence doesn't make much sense: "Changes always fail unexplainable way."
I haven't read the book so I'm not exactly sure how the sentence should be fixed. Perhaps "Changes always fail in unexplainable ways."
Could someone who has read the book and knows what this sentence refers to please fix this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.180.91 (talk) 05:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)