Talk:The Seattle Times
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] A criticism of the 'Criticisms' section
I'm a bit dubious about the "Criticisms" section: as it stands, none of the stated criticisms are backed up by references. (Where there is a statement of the form "The Times was criticized for doing X", some of them have references showing that the Times did do X, but none have references showing that the Times was criticized.) What's more, nowhere does it state who did the criticizing, merely referring to unnamed "many critics". --Paul A 16:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, and I have removed pending citations of actual criticism. Even then, I'm not sure that it is noteworthy that some people disagreed with the Times' political endorsements, since it is pretty much given that someone is going to disagree with any endorsement. CAVincent 22:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

