From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
|
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A plot summary needs to be added to this film article, or the current one needs to be expanded. |
 |
Please add more information about the cast and the crew, discussing the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, and giving insights into the casting and staffing where possible. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines for more advice. |
 |
This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Shot back to back with A Study in Terror and The Reptile -- that information came from:
Rigby, Jonathan, English Gothic: A Century of Horror Cinema, Reynolds & Hearn 2000 ISBN 1903111013
here's the edit that introduced added it - there were originally two articles "Plague" and "The Plague". I expanded "Plague" and then merge it into "The Plague". Unfortunately, the book in question has gone back to the library so I can't now triple-check it. - Motor (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Aha, I just checked with English Gothic, and I can see what confused you. It does refer to four back-to-back productions in 1965, but it is referring to Dracula: Prince of Darkness, filmed back-to-back with Rasputin, the Mad Monk, and The Plague of the Zombies, filmed back-to-back with The Reptile. A Study in Terror was a non-Hammer film that just happened to be shot in the same year. I admit, though, Rigby does make it a bit ambiguous, and it could sound as if he is is saying A Study in Terror was part of the four Hammer productions. - Dave Rattigan 18:09 25 April 2006 GMT
-
- I see... well, at least it's a good example of why you should always quote your source. - Motor (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Plague of zombies poster3.jpg
Image:Plague of zombies poster3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)