Talk:The Minority Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novels
Literature Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove auto=yes from this template.
  • If you disagree, please change the assessment by editing the class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article itself.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Short story task force. (with unknown importance)
This article is supported by the Science fiction task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Novels because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WikiProject Novels}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{NovelsWikiProject}} template, removing {{WikiProject Novels}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Books Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

[edit] Differences between story and the film

The article states: "Precrime is a government branch in the story and a Police department in the movie." I just listened to the audio book and precrime 'is' a police department. Can some someone confirm that this is the same in the written text, and if so, change the article - i.e. remove the above passage.

It is alluded to in the second chapter, shortly after the Anderson introduces to Witwer to his wife Lisa (page 8). It is explicitly stated by page 15, when Anderson tells Kaplan he is the Commissioner of Police.

[edit] "Like many time travel stories,"...

In article, it is said: "Like many time travel stories,"... but this is not a time travel story, so this is misleading.Saigon from europe 12:59, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

I read that line as "Like many time travel stories, this story about people with the ability to see into the future questions the existance of free will." It doesn't say that Minority Report, itself, is a time travel story, but that it addresses the same philosphical questions many time travel stories also touch on. (And yeah - I know that comment was ancient.) — Indi [ talk ] 21:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Editing for other content, clarified this as well - ChaunceyMo

[edit] The Minority Report

Since the title of the short story (as opposed from the movie or books of collection including the story) actually is The Minority Report, I propose that this article be moved to The Minority Report. --193.11.177.69 14:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree. No reason to call this article Minority Report when the title of the short story is The Minority Report. It may seem like a subtle difference, but you might as well call the Blade Runner article Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. DT29 01:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Definitely, the only reason the title is "Minority Report" is because that is the name of the film. The story is called "The Minority Report" and so the page should be.

[edit] Incorrect Summary?

If I remember correctly (can't find my copy of the book right now, unfortunately) the premise in the book was that the "minority report" issue only arose when it was the commissioner who would be found guilty. This worked as follows:

* The first precog said, "Yes, he will kill the man."
* The second precog said, "Since he has the knowledge from the first precog, he will not kill the man."
* The third precog said, "Since he has the knowledge from the first and second precogs, he will, in fact, kill the man."

I'm not one hundred percent sure that that's right, though, so I'm hesitant to change it; does anyone who has a copy of the book handy care to comment? 70.16.57.154 03:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


I think this is correct. The theme of the story is that the making of predictions can itself change the future, if the subject is aware of the prediction. As I recall, there is no suggestion that Anderton can exercise free will to choose between the three futures - only that the first two predictions become invalid as a result of Anderton knowing about them. 222.152.182.245 08:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


You remember right, and it should be included as one of the major differences between the book and the film (the original concept probably would be too difficult to understand for the mass public, hence in the film it's just that one of the precogs is "more accurate" because of being a woman :] ) 86.29.93.122 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I remember reading in an issue of Wizard, that this story was going to be made into a sequel to Totall Recall. Does anyone else have anymore information?

[edit] Weak Plot Premise?

I'm curious, in the book Anderson founded Precrime and has at least some grasp of how the precogs function. Why would he, after 30 years as the CEO and Commissioner of Police, be so clueless about the Minority Reports and predetermination? Has this logical flaw in the story's premise ever been mentioned by critics or addressed the author? 76.241.116.168 (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)