Talk:The Indian Express

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article...

Contents

[edit] Indian Express , The Indian Express and The New Indian Express

Indian Express was the name of the newspaper till 1999/2000 and then when it was split between two factions of Goenka families the Mumbai headquarted North & West Indian edition became The Indian Express (note the prefix 'the'),while the Souhtern editions headquarted in Chennai became The New Indian Express.Hence all Indian Express is supposed to have a seperate page as it was earlier. Southernstar (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Where is the page INDIAN EXPRESS

It seems that out of some misunderstanding / confusion the page INDIAN EXPRESS has been merged with THE INDIAN EXPRESS.Tough they are same newspapers they need a different page as the INDIAN EPXRESS name was common for both the current day THE INDIAN EXPRESS and THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS.May be if there is no response/concerns then I will try to restore that page.Also I will try to add the reasons for bifurication. Southernstar (talk) 10:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


Please add some information about the bifurcation to Indian Express and New Indian Express which happened some where in the 2000s

PeaSea 18:06, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

the new indian express came into being after a split from the original express the express group was divided into north and south. the new indian express takes care of the south. the express is known to have been one of the best newspaper under ramnath goenka

[edit] hi

hi my name is yusof and i just send u this mail of that ,,,i was looking for sadia delvi articale by name of dont be wach just yusof wach......can u plz mail me this articale to me i think this articale is 7 years old ...if u send me i will be very happy ......my email address is alexkhanwal@hotmail.com

[edit] ====was ist das?..this is not a chatting service

In the last part of article of indian turnaround is discussed....reason for this has been attributed to the shifting of head office premsises!Does the Nariman Point's Vaastualone,if indeed is the case, account for the turnaround???


[edit] Where's the neutrality discussion ?

I can't find any discussion of the disputed neutrality of this article here, as mentioned in the tag at the top of the article. Anyway, getting to the point, I think the lines "its loyalty to its "watchdog" role has withstood the test of time. Though sales are uncomparable to other national dailies, The Indian Express, along with The Hindu newspaper headquartered in South India are the more respected newspapers in India" do seem to require some kind of a citation. However these statements are not unjustified, and correctly represent the newspaper's reputation. Otherwise, the article seems pretty neutral. Responses are welcome. -- Amit 12:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please refrain from using wikipedia as an op-ed column

This reads like an opinion piece and not an encyclopedia article. Please back statements like "...earning it the displeasure of those with vested political interests or in disagreement with its ideology" with citations. I would prefer such statements be edited out completely. In fact the whole article needs some significant amount of research/rewrite so that some of the more controversial statements can be properly verified. Other gems include "The Indian Express is considered to be far less focussed on consumer preferences than its upmarket-targeted competitor, The Times of India."

[edit] Sign

Hey ev'body please sign your messages pleeeeeease!! And let's just stick to English already. --Amit 17:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

Hi, I've made considerable changes to achieve NPOV. Please review it. If everyone agrees we can remove the "Neutrality" tag at the top. Thanks. Amit@Talk 12:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)