Talk:The Five Orange Pips

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novels This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove auto=yes from this template.
  • If you disagree, please change the assessment by editing the class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article itself.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Short story task force. (with unknown importance)
This article is supported by the Crime task force. (with unknown importance)
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Novels because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WikiProject Novels}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{NovelsWikiProject}} template, removing {{WikiProject Novels}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
???

[edit] the breaking of the KKK

"In fact, at the time, the Ku Klux Klan was already decisively broken by the U.S. authorities, with its revival in 1915 still long in the future"

I think this should be reworded. After all the short story itself offers an explanation of why the KKK lost power: "the sudden breaking up of the society was coincident with the disappearance of Openshaw from America" as Sherlock Holmes says himself. As written, this implies an oversight which simply isn't there. 85.227.226.168 18:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] incomprehensible

I removed the following passage:

"In Sept 1887 John Openshaw receives a letter postmarked from London's Eastern division and the same message his father received. The only clue John can furnish is a diary page marked March 1869 in which "pips" are sent to three men of whom two have "cleared" and one was "Visited" which he had found in a fireplace among the burned papers."

Feel free to put it back again if you can untangle the grammar 85.227.226.168 18:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)