Talk:The Fifth Element/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 WikiQuote 2 Planet name 3 Language 4 Zorg's Bomb 5 Star Wars References 6 Fhloston 7 Explanation to the moon thing 8 How Did They Get Leeloo 9 Year 2257 or 2263 10 Keep clear 11 New York Race Game 12 Plot Summary too long 13 Great article but it needs a few more things 14 In-joke 15 Error in plot summary 16 Question about the Death of the Assistant 17 Fifth element(?) 18 Please Remove Fact Tags 19 Pictures 20 Merge from Fhloston 21 The ZF1 22 Leeloo's Divine Language 23 Diva Performance Not Digitally Altered? 24 A Colorful Futuristic World 25 Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg 26 Metropolis homage 27 Some rework? 28 Stab at plot shortening 29 Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg 30 Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg

[edit] WikiQuote

Wikiquote moved to external links section, where it belongs.

[edit] Planet name

Does anyone know for sure whether the planet is called Phloston or Fhloston? --WhiteDragon 13:44, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• It's Fhloston.[1] click link (it's a copy of the script) and do a find for it. Martin TB 13:51, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Do you think our current moon was also once an "ultimate evil" according to this movie? GWC Winter 34 2005 EDT 13.35

If so, then the moon is only 5,000 years old and we've only had this problem once before. So, unless the good aliens haul the garbage away, having left one behind to keep the electromagnetic field going that protects us from the sun, there is a serious plot problem of not enough moons hanging around...

I don't think the dark planet is as big as the moon but I guess it is possible that the moon represents an earlier close call, since I doubt it's always this close to world destruction. Ari 07:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Uh...just out of curiosity, did The Fifth Element do good in the box office?- B-101 01:50, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think we should get some more images for the plot section.- JustPhil 18:22, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Language

From the short quotations in the article it does not look like the divine language is based on Russian at all. Is there a source somewhere saying that it is so? If not, I would recommend deleting that claim from the article.

It looks more like Finnish than anything... sounds nothing like it though.

It sounds more like hawaiian.Ittan 02:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zorg's Bomb

I believe that Zorg was blown up by the Mangalore bomb, not by his own. He disabled his at the last moment, and the Mangalores set off one that they brought on board.

Could someone verify this and possibly correct the article. - Daemon 00:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

It does seem that it was a seperate bomb that went off in the end. Oh, and ****spoiler here**** am I the only one that finds it strange that Gary Oldman's character dies in the same way in Leon (being destroyed by a bomb he is made aware of only seconds before it is detonated)?

Yes Zork is killed by the Mengalore bomb. You see a Mengalore lying on his back with what looks like a Master Combination lock that he twists and says "For Honor" which is pretty funny when you consider the conversation Zork was having when the explosion at his factory took place.Cortney (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Star Wars References

I heard Zorg call one of the Mangalore's a 'jedi' during the scene when they meet to exchange the stones for the weapons. Daemon 01:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that the SW references actually are references, but are coincidences or similarities at best. PrometheusX303 16:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I was in agreement with Prometheusx303 and edited the trivia and deleted the paragraph entirely. A couple could be pointed to as interesting similarities, the are unsubstantiated as fact and don't really amount to true trivia about The Fifth Element.[[User:Atomic Cow|

What about the hair style of the big soldier woman that General Munro wanted to go with Korben to the travel? The hairstyle is like Princess Leia's hair buns.Codeweaponx 07:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fhloston

I created a new article about Fhloston Paradise and would appreciate it if some could visit it and maybe improve it, also add information? I am also trying to get an image into Wikipedia of the Fhloston Paradise Luxury Cruiser, any ideas? thanks alot... Gryffindor 10:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Explanation to the moon thing

Hey, White Dragon. You've got quite an interesting theory there, but I think it needs revision. First of all, I don't think they ever showed a full shot of the Earth, so maybe the actual Moon was at that time in the other side of the world. Another reason why the dark planet cannot be the Moon is that we already have a Moon and the whole movie happens somewhere in the future!

Yes, they showed a full shot of the earth. And they showed the moon when the Dark Planet was defeated. The Dark Planet looked like a craterless moon. 68.225.242.19 07:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

I do think the Moon could be another defeated dark planet, though... if the story was real, that is. The Moon is obviously more than 5,000 old because the Earth is more than a million years old and scientist say the Moon is even older--so the Moon wasn't created last time that whole Fifth Element "happened". However, they never said in the movie that the dark planet heads for the Earth each time this apocalypse-like event occurs... maybe that's why Saturn has so many moons! After all, the Mondoshawan were aliens. I think that's all I have to say. Au revoir!--Plavalagunanbanshee 21:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

While I do think they're from Jupitor, it does seem likely that a lotta rocks out there (Pluto, for instance) could be older Dark Planets. ;D 68.225.242.19 07:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Unless the evidence that existed that stated that the moon is older than 5000 is a side effect of its unusual creation. Keep in mind you're dealing with a strange, powerful being of unknown prowess that seems to attempt to use Earth as a focal point for universal destruction every five thousand revolutions of the Earth. I'd wager the normal rules can be discarded in light of this. 68.225.242.19 07:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

It's also possible that only one time did the previous dark planet manage to get that close. I mean for most of Earth's history the 5 elements were (presumably) close at hand and ready to go at a moment's notice. So perhaps one time WAAAY back they defeated a dark planet and it became the moon. Then every 5000 years afterwards they defeated the planet before it even got close to Earth, leaving it adrift in space somewhere. - Vulture12 March 21 2007

[edit] How Did They Get Leeloo

the hand they use to recreate her is clutching a handle, implying that it is an alien.yet she is the fifth element, which is a statue....this does not make since —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDude7776 (talk • contribs)

That "statue" was a sarcophagus that contained the Fifth Element, presumably in some sort of state of suspended animation, until she was needed again. I believe it is even referred to as a sarcophagus in the film. I lent my DVD to a friend, so I can't check it right now. The Mondochiwan took Leeloo in 1914 and told the priest that she would be returned "when evil returns." They were on their way back to return her when the Mangalores shot down the ship killing all of the occupants.

One thing I can't answer though is how Leeloo retained all of her thoughts and memories even though her brain was destroyed in the crash. Maybe it's somehow written into her 'perfect' genetic sequence.

I don't understand how clutching a handle implies that the hand alien. I hold the handle on a shopping cart when I use it - does that make me extraterrestrial? o.0 — Indi ^{[ talk ]} 17:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

In 'ordinary' cloning there is no way your thoughts and memories can be coded into your DNA to be remembered by clones. However, this is an extremly popular misconception, most recently found in Aeon Flux. I think it is implied that the extra strands of DNA achieved the job. If it was possible to have 6 strands of DNA then there is no reason that you couldn't use the extra four strands as some kind of read/write mechanism. Of course that would require having a write mechanism. Note that it is absolutly impossible to have a six stranded DNA helix (maybe some other kind of molecule could do it, but not our DNA). In the film they show a double helix, i.e. two intertwined ribbons, with plenty of room for other ribbons. However, the ribbon is only the backbone and is only an outline of the shape of the backbone. In reality (in a space filling model) all the atoms pretty much fill up all the space inside the helix outlined by the ribbon model. But hey, that's why this is science fiction, not science documentary. Nobody watches this film for education. ChristineD 21:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Year 2257 or 2263

I notice two conflicting years. In some reviews they state 2257, yet close inspection of on-screen props (Korban's clock) it says 2263. Tertiary7 22:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

The reviews are mistaken. The year this story takes place is 2263. Comme le Lapin 06:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but don't forget when Leeloo was taken from earth it was 1914. If it was like 300 years later, it would be 2214, not 2263. Upon trying to figure out exactly when Leeloo was born before 1914, it would have been 2786 BC. I simply subtracted 5000 from 2214. I totally agree with the mix-up. Armoredavian 20:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keep clear

"A brief scene in Korbens apartment makes reference to the religious cult Scientology founded by science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard. As Korben sits on his bed in the morning, he views a message stenciled onto the wall that states, "KEEP CLEAR". Reading this message Korben responds, "I'm trying"."

I thought he was replying to the cigarette dispenser. I can't remember what it said, though. PrometheusX303 01:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I wish I had a screen cap scene. He was definitly talking to the stencil on the wall. "Keep Clear" :)

I always thought when he said "Im trying" he was referring to keeping a clear head. Perhaps he was an alcoholic after he left the military. He does seem, at least, to be a recovering alcoholic. 67.50.94.121 02:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, Korban wakes up in the morning and that throbing mechanical music is playing. Korban sits up, and sits on the edge of the bed....rubbing his neck he looks at the sign on the wall (obviously there before the room was made for human habitation) that says "KEEP CLEAR" Looking at the stenciled words he says, "I'm trying" What is interesting is that Luc Besson is french. Scientology in France has been under fire since the early 1980's and investigated by France's Justice Ministry. The church of scientology has been accused by France of Fraud. I don't find it strange at all that the director being french would find this type of reference funny. Dionysious7

I think you are reading way too much into a couple lines. The "Keep clear" line sits inbetween two sets of yellow circles. The same circles the police request Corben and fake-corben to put their hands on and is most likely a police warning. Remember wikipedia is not for original research or hunches. -- Ari 16:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I always figured that Korben replied "I'm trying" in reference to his trying to keep clear of life's hurdles and problems....and how trouble and things going wrong always seem to find him. There was nothing in the film that had anything to do with scientology. 64.208.152.156 21:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

And nothing in this article needs to reflect that concept. Comme le Lapin 06:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Ummm, Korben may have been staring at the wall and saying, "I'm trying." however, the cigarette machine replied with, "To quit is by goal!" After the phone rang, he still lit a cigarette anyway. Which may indicate, he was talking to the machine, instead of looking at it.Armoredavian 20:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I basically agree with 64.208.152.156, although to me, it sounds like he actually says "I try", not "I'm trying". It was my belief that he was referring to his apartment in general, and it's size and contents, a fact that is later mentioned by General Munro. He would say "I try." meaning, "Yes, this apartment is small, unappealing, and it's contents less than desirable, but I try to do my best." or something to that effect.

While I do not agree with the Scientology theory, he definitely says "I try" several seconds before the cigarette machine says "To quit is my goal" and several seconds after the machine says "Four a day". This lets us know that it was most likely not in reference to it. It's my opinion that he was thinking about life in general, as an above poster mentioned. Also, for the record, it was "I try" and not "Im trying". 70.190.243.171 01:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New York Race Game

It's Says it was inspired by the film the fifth element so should this be added?

• There was another flying car game set in New (Neo) York very similar to this called Beambreakers. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plot Summary too long

It appears to be in need of being summarized itself. Jon 15:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Comme le Lapin 21:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I've edited the plot summary to a length that's more appropriate to a synopsis. It was almost 1,250 words; I edited it down to 1024, and edited it again down to 994 words. As it's not a novelization, every detail of the story doesn't need to be described. It seems a synopsis of a film's story could be written in 500 words, or at the very least, not more than 1000. Comme le Lapin 18:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Great article but it needs a few more things

One thing that can be added to the article is what sort of Reception the film got on its release, was it liked or disliked by the Critics? (The Critics usually pan most Sci-Fi).

Is it generally considered a good movie by the Public and critics or is it just liked by Sci-Fi fans?

And secondly was the film commercially successful (i.e. did it make money or lose money, etc.)? I assume that was successful, but what was it's, what's the word?... "Box Office gross"?

--Hibernian 02:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

All these topics have been since been addressed. Comme le Lapin 06:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] In-joke

As a digital in-joke, the license plates on the flying cars say "New York, the fuck you state". Of course, the slogan is too small to be read on screen.

If this can't be seen, how is it verified? PrometheusX303 16:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It says that on IMDb.- JustPhil 21:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok. It does say that. But since anybody can add trivia, are there any other sources? (Amazon.com, but the same deal) PrometheusX303 00:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Error in plot summary

It's really an error in the movie: they don't put the evil planet into orbit around the Earth. All they do is stop its forward velocity (I think at "52 miles 'till impact"). As it is well within the Earth's sphere of influence, it will immediately begin to accelerate due to gravity, and crash into the Earth a few minutes later. There's no "movie error" section, and I think that the IDEA is that it is in orbit, so I suppose I'll leave it in the summary.. 100DashSix 14:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

An error in the summary (not in the film) is the statement that Leeloo is "meant to meet the diva Plavalaguna, who is performing at a charity ball in a hotel on Fhloston" (loosely paraphrasing). She's actually performing at such a ball on the cruise ship in orbit around the planet, not in a hotel on the planet's surface. Or do I have that wrong after watching the film three times? Canonblack 06:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Correct. All action on Phloston takes place on the cruise ship. It was near the surface, but moved to orbit before the diva's performance. The ship was in orbit when it blew. PrometheusX303 12:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Is it an error? the cruise ship IS the hotel. Alson the evil planet stops at 63 miles above the surface, which makes sense considering Luc Besson is European (63 miles = 100 kilometers). TinyMark 19:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question about the Death of the Assistant

A small reference to the original James Bond novel Casino Royale exists within Fifth Element, at the New York "Spaceport" when Zorg causes the phone booth to explode via remote control following his conversation with his assistant Right Arm.

Maybe I've been expossed to too much cyberpunk but I thought that the bomb that blew up was in the assistant not the phone. As far as it goes it would be much easier to put a bomb in the assistant than to put a bomb in every phone booth on the planet. I've not read the scrip so I could be wrong here.

Isn't the point that Zorg manufactures almost everything in this future?

I took that scene to mean that he can cause any device to blow up at his command.

- 194.203.201.92 13:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

IMO, he sent a detonation code through his phone to his assistant's phone. 64.208.152.156 21:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fifth element(?)

Wouldn't the fifth element be called "Aether"?

Not according to the film's script, no. Comme le Lapin 21:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

It would be metal. Judging by the sarcophagus being made of it. Armoredavian 08:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Not many people get that the fifth element is love. Cornelius the priest identifies Leeloo's tatoo as the symbol of the fifth element. He later identifies her as the (or a) supreme being; perfect. At the end Cornelius realizes and whispers "Tell her" from his spot by the water stone. She and the stones are in place, but it is only when Korben professes his love for her, and the audience is led to believe it's true love, is the fifth element in place and the weapon works. In order for love to exist, a "person" has to be there to feel it, and that is Leeloo's function as a part of the weapon.

And the summary is silly long. Towermac 02:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please Remove Fact Tags

This article no longer contains unsourced statements, and should be removed from the categories "Articles with unsourced statements since February 2007" as well as "All articles with unsourced statements." Comme le Lapin 06:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures

All of the pictures were removed here and apparently no one cared so I added them back in.--76.16.222.135 23:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The images are a much-needed improvement. Thanks. Comme le Lapin 06:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge from Fhloston

Please merge any relevant content from Fhloston per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fhloston. (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.) Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 09:37Z

I can see that nothing has been added from the article here, so there can be no "merger" of articles to speak off. I am adding all the information into the main article, or a separate article should be restored, either way. Gryffindor 10:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The ZF1

There doesn't seem to be an article on the ZF1, when it's created, it should be linked here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Science_fiction_weapons Many of the functions of the ZF1 actually worked in some fashion. The net launcher fired a net, the rocket launcher was real too. I don't recall what else was real on it. (Obviously the 'instant replay' homing bullets and big red button that blew it up weren't real!)

[edit] Leeloo's Divine Language

Have you ever wanted to know exactly what Leeloo was saying throughout the movie? A few sites have the language attached but does not have complete spoken phrases in the movie. Especially in the subtitles. For example, Mlarta is wrong. Leeloo said, "Oualarta!" It's pronounced, "WAH-LAR-TAH!" Leeloo wasn't even her real name. It was what she was seeking, those stones. There's so much confusion, I'm going to end up buying the book by Luc Besson to figure out what was said. If I do that, I will try to list the entire explaination. There are so many misinterpreted pronunciated sounds and confusingly spelt words involved. If anyone has that book, please list the entire explaination/glossary. I wish Luc Besson published the entire language used throughout the movie. Armoredavian 08:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I own the book. The glossary is drastically different from the words listed in the script and in the novelization of the film. Leeloo is, indeed, her name. You can't figure out her speech from the glossary to translate to the film, many, many words are missing from the glossary that are in the script and what can be picked out from the film and matched to it. Many of those sites are taking phrases from the script and mashing them with the published dictionary. Leeloo's full name as officially printed is "Leeloominai Lekatariba Lamina-Tchai Ekbat De Sebat." All the information on her name is in Besson's book, sadly, it is not much. One distinct set of words that you can hear Leeloo using when she is discussing where to find the stones, "Lacta ligunai" is in the glossary, and it means "universe" or "galaxy." "Seno akta gammat" in the glossary is translated as "I quick..." and there is nothing for "gammat." There are no words published to make the phrase "Never without my permission" in the Divine Language glossary.

The book is now out of print and a good condition copy regularly goes for well over $100. I obtained a copy over 8 years ago and it was the rarer version, and it cost $75. LeeloosGotAGun 09:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)LeeloosGotAGun

Yeesh! That's a shame! I hate when that happens in movies. I so wanted to translate what Leeloo was saying throughout the entire movie in her language. It doesn't even seem worth the money now. Armoredavian 03:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, just for specific, other content alone I think the book is a gem. Though if I hadn't bought it when I did, I probably wounld't purchase now if I could find it because the price can get out of hand. But it is an awesome book...Well worth having. You can create dialogue out of the dictionary, just not the same dialogues as in the film. I remember being disappointed too, but still cool to own.I'd like to eventually set up my own 5th website, but that's time I'm sorely lacking at this point and I'd have tow addle through all the info. I can get long-winded sometimes. But the Divine Language would be a part of it. LeeloosGotAGun 19:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh PLEASE link it here, so we can see the dictionary provided in your book. *crosses her fingers* Armoredavian 20:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diva Performance Not Digitally Altered?

The article currently says, "in a documentary feature on the Special Edition DVD release, it is stated that Mula-Tchako's voice was not digitally altered", referring to the aria of the diva. That feature may well say so, but can anyone confirm this is actually true? For example, there is a passage where the timbre of the voice shifts along with the pitch, in a way characteristic of digital pitch shifting. The claim of the entire performance being sung as heard is not implausible, but it would be an improvement to state more precisely what exactly was and was not done in post-production, as technically every bit of the soundtrack was "digitally altered" in some ways, and the question is, to what extent is the commentary on the special edition DVD oversimplifying?

Changed "stated" to "claimed" in order to reflect this controversy. To a trained ear, these down-shifted notes (which, basically, wouldn't be necessary if the singer's chest voice is powerful enough) stand out clearly from the other notes. -- megA 09:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Some of the volcalised notes look different to the others in a spectrograph. 79.74.185.179 (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A Colorful Futuristic World

Alot of people have unnatural hairstyles and colors.

In Chinese Astrology, colors are represented as the elements.

Fire red & purple water blue & black earth orange, yellow, & brown wood green metal white, gray, silver, & gold

So if Leeloo's hair was orange with yellow roots, she might be seen as earthy, despite her metal element. Also she was found in a desert, which would be an arid climate known to represent the element metal. However, the earth elemental-born people are helpful to metal-born people. So that may be why, she wore, white, and gold. Or just a concidence.

Armoredavian 09:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

According to the movie, the 5th element is not metal, but love. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.238.149.150 (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg

Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Metropolis homage

The influence section says that several scenes pay homage to "Metropolis," but says no more about which scenes or how. It needs examples or a citation

[edit] Some rework?

Since I'm watching the movie at present (third time it's been on ITV2 in a fortnight!) it occurred to me we could lose a lot of minor stuff. The plot summary is flagged as being too long in relation to the rest of the article; that means in a simplistic sense, making the article longer or the summary shorter. I've already taken the liberty of tabulating the minor characters/cameos (are they really cameos?) & moving what I can elsewhere, out if necessary. If readers want to know what Red Dwarf is, for example, they can follow the link without being told, although I guess if they're into 5th Element they would be likely to have heard of it. From the plot summary, detail like Korben's mother's phone calls could be lost without detriment. Also there is repetition of detail and wordage such as "give them anything in exchange for their efforts" (="pay them"?). I'll have a stab at it if nobody objects but I don't want to go wading in with both feet, and I'll leave a reasonable time for this to appear on watchlists. Meanwhile, "anyone else wanna negotiate?". --Rodhullandemu 22:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stab at plot shortening

I've taken a stab at shortening the plot; pretty much this means shortening much of what happens in the second fourth of the movie (the Fhloston tickets, the stuff at the airport), but also just cutting down elsewhere. Some of these are really hard to write towards given the direction nature of Luc Besson, so hopefully it will cover those. --Masem 22:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Likewise, have managed to trim some more without, I hope, losing any meaning. Have also removed the "too long" tag. --Rodhullandemu 01:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg

Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Note to other editors: Dealt with (needed at minimum an article name that the image is used in). --Masem 04:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed, just added fair-use rationale. --Rodhullandemu 04:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg

Image:The Fifth Element soundtrack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Fixed again, as the article name aspect was at issue. --MASEM 21:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)