From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Novels (Rated GA-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. |
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
|
This article has an infobox template in need of a 1st Edition Cover! |
Assessment comments
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
| WikiProject Literature (Rated GA-Class) |
 |
The Feast of the Goat is part of WikiProject Literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
|
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
[edit] GA review
GA review
[edit] Passed
Congratulations to all involved for your efforts on this article over the past fortnight, I have passed this article. It is of sufficiently broad in coverage, reasonably well-written, and adequately (though not perfectly) verified. I think it has enough in terms of content and breadth to be a strong candidate for featured status, but still does not read perfectly in the WP house style for my perhaps over-sensitive ears. Stricutres of no original research and attribution are more difficult to honour for literary topics where so much of the article consists in interpretation, but this is a surmountable difficulty. I recommend submitting to peer review, and wish you all the best of luck. Regards, Skomorokh 16:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations all! EyeSerenetalk 17:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the help everyone. What a relief! Garethshort (talk) 22:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Additional comments
Article is mostly there, though there are a few minor issues that remain and should be fixed.
- A couple of manual of style issues; some unnecessary bold text in paragraphs, some dates need to be properly formatted and wiki-linked, etc. I would recommend a good copyedit by an editor that is familiar with the manual of style.
- The lead section is very long. See if you can shorten it a bit, keeping it to a good summary of the article.
Other than that, the article is very good. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)