Talk:The Feast of the Goat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article The Feast of the Goat has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 17, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
This article was the subject of a Spring 2008 educational assignment: Murder, Madness, and Mayhem.
Garethshort, jen.chim, and sunnybeddow thank the FA-Team and WikiProject Novels for their help.
Revision summary: 4 February, 2008, 348 revisions, 17 April, 2008. GA status achieved.
We invite you to make further improvements and changes.


[edit] GA review

GA review

[edit] Passed

Congratulations to all involved for your efforts on this article over the past fortnight, I have passed this article. It is of sufficiently broad in coverage, reasonably well-written, and adequately (though not perfectly) verified. I think it has enough in terms of content and breadth to be a strong candidate for featured status, but still does not read perfectly in the WP house style for my perhaps over-sensitive ears. Stricutres of no original research and attribution are more difficult to honour for literary topics where so much of the article consists in interpretation, but this is a surmountable difficulty. I recommend submitting to peer review, and wish you all the best of luck. Regards, Skomorokh 16:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations all! EyeSerenetalk 17:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the help everyone. What a relief! Garethshort (talk) 22:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Additional comments

Article is mostly there, though there are a few minor issues that remain and should be fixed.

  • A couple of manual of style issues; some unnecessary bold text in paragraphs, some dates need to be properly formatted and wiki-linked, etc. I would recommend a good copyedit by an editor that is familiar with the manual of style.
  • The lead section is very long. See if you can shorten it a bit, keeping it to a good summary of the article.

Other than that, the article is very good. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)