Talk:The Drama of the Lost Disciples
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page.
|
||
This article is full of weasle words and sounds like orginal research. Which modern scholar is refuting this Jowett?
~~
- I wondered when someone would try this tactic. If checking citations is "original research", then what's the point of including them? Jowett's book is demostrably riddled with falsehoods, and if you want to claim that pointing out those falsehoods is invalid, then I have to wonder about your motivations. --Nicknack009 17:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
