Talk:The Animal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Animals' List

Imdb was useless althought it mentioned that if one saw "cuts" one could know the whole animal list; I do not know if this implies a longer version did have a canon list of animals Marvin Mange is supposed to receive body parts from. The more readily obvious animals involved are a Dog, a Sea Lion (some would claim a dolphin for his swimming and even the hearing but the noises sounded more like those of a sea lion to me), some sort of simian or primate or whatever is applied to all hominids and monkeys alike, and of course (he was recognized as related to himself by an orangutan who, nonetheless, recognized humans as different from himself; I would be going "orangutan" for him but the doctor is implied to have chimpanzee mostly in the area of such beings as they are more appropiate circus animals; he also showed a great climbing ability somewhen), a beaver (he made a dam) and some bird (he instinctively fed one through regurgitation), a goat (he felt attracted to their pheromones), a horse (he sounded like one in the bathroom), an elephant (he sounded like one too there) and a bull (or maybe it was the elephant, he charged the waiter). I've found claims I cannot aprove or disprove; a cat (I didn't saw all the scenes), a puma (he did scare the dog without an effort), a cheetah (he outran a horse, that as well could come from the horse or the combination of animals). His skills were super hearing, super smell, super speed, super strength and great leaping (maybe from the feline aspects proposed). Seeing his gained ability and his ridicoulsy large list of apparent animal donnors it could be thought that his animal self was attuned to no single group of animals limited thus to those used in making him survive but to animals in general, animals everywhere, maybe with greater inclination to those who were used but extending beyond them to all animals.Be it however it could be a script-based list, specially if of an uncut script or such canonical or well analysed list would be a good addendum to the short article. Herle King 08:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] blahblah

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

I'm pretty sure this article's a little biased...I don't even think I need to explain where or how either.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)