Image:TheFamilyDoctorDec21 1889page255.png

[edit] Beskrivelse

Image:TheFamilyDoctorDec21_1889page255cut.png

THE

FAMILY DOCTOR

AND PEOPLE'S MEDICAL ADVISER.

No. 251. SATURDAY, DECEMBER 21, 1889 PRICE ONE PENNY

THE CORSET QUESTION.

SIR,--I now send you my promised sketches of the pernicious and proper shapes for corsets, what I may call the hygienic shape for tight stays. This may seem to many of your readers a contradiction in terms, but when one sees the vast quantity of badly - shaped corsets that are the cause of half the ills ascribed to tight-lacing. The properly­shaped are dis­tinctly hygienic compared with the badly­shaped. The shape, besides varying according to the natural form of the wearer, should be formed on certain common sense lines, thus :--

The waist should be in ita natural place.

There should be plenty of room for the chest.

The curve at the waist should not be too sharp.

The corset should go well down over the hips.

The busk should be flexible at the top and firm at the bottom.

The front should support the bust.

We will see how far the requirements are adhered to in the sketches of types annexed.

What I have called the "Flat Chest" is too often found among cheap stays, particularly in the country, and with the old fashioned non­front fastening. It cannot be too strongly condemned.

The " High Curve" is a slight exaggeration upon another common form, and, of course, cruelly contracts the ribs and all vitals therein, and would cause a host of troubles to liver, stomach, kidneys, &c., not to mention the lungs and heart.

The " Long V" was the form very common in Hogarth's time, but it contracts the ribs a great deal too much for tight lacing or even ordinary wear, though it has a nice appearance, and is much to be preferred in the matter of health to the other two. It is not a form of cheap stay.

The two "Hour-glass" forms, long and short, are again still better, particularly the short. They have both the objection of being too sharply curved at the waist, and not spreading out sharply enough over the hips, thus pressing the waist up a little. They also, particularly the long form, are not eased to the shape of the ribs. They unduly squeeze the lower ribs without any corresponding advantage of form.

This is of course less marked with the short "Hour-glass" --that is one of the easiest shapes to wear. The "Hygienic Curve" is nicely eased to the ribs and hips, and only small where the body can easiest stand pressure without harm. It is shown with shoulder-straps, which I think ought to be put to all stays to draw the shoulders back and prevent the pernicious hahit that so many women have of leaning the body forward on the busk when tired. This is the most fruitful source of indigestion and a stooping habit. To all the advantages of this style of form may be added last, but certainly not least, a most graceful form, full of Hogarth's line of beauty viewed from every direction.

Hoping that you may be able to find use for the above remarks and for the drawings.

I am, yours faithfully,

SCIENCE AND ART,

VOL. X.

from Science and Art.

[edit] Licensing

This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The original image comprising the work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired. This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Côte d'Ivoire has a general copyright term of 99 years and Honduras has 75 years, but they do implement that rule of the shorter term. العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Ελληνικά | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Kurdî / كوردی | Lietuvių | Magyar | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | Bahasa Melayu | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Suomi | Sámegiella | Türkçe | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | 粵語 | +/- Under United States copyright law, originality of expression is necessary for copyright protection, and a mere photograph of an out-of-copyright work may not be protected under U.S.copyright law. This photograph was taken in the U.S. or in another country where a similar rule applies (for a list of allowable countries, see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Country-specific rules). This photographic reproduction is therefore also in the public domain. العربية | Česky | Deutsch | English | Ελληνικά | Español | فارسی | Français | עברית | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Basa Sunda | Türkçe | Українська | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | ‪中文(简体)‬ | +/-

• The Family Doctor