User talk:Tex66436
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Tex66436 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template. If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. |
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I blieve this is a mistake I need a Different Adminstrator to review"
Decline reason: "even if you're not a sock, you seem only interested in vandalism. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I blieve this is a mistake I would like to request another Adminstrator to review"
Decline reason: "It's not a mistake. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I strongly believe this block it's too harsh can another admin review this please thank you"
Decline reason: "I agree with Jpgordon, all your edits have been disruptive. — -- lucasbfr talk 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "still yet the block needs review and I STRONGLY agree this is way too harsh and it needs to be reviewed firther because Iam a new user and i did not intend to disrupt any edits so I appreciate if the admins had a chat about this because believe me this is too harsh thank you"
Decline reason: "Hi. I'm the fourth and last admin to review your block and agree with the rest. I've also protected your page to prevent a fifth request for review, as four should be sufficient. — Lara❤Love 18:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- If you'd like to discuss this block without the use of the unblock template, feel free to do so here. Lara❤Love 18:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

