Talk:Telugu literature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian literature, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian literature. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

More information about this article...

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Dravidian related topics. If you would like to participate, please feel free to visit the project page to join.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s importance scale.

with such a track record how can any one ask classical language status for telugu ??

By then both kannada & tamil were in their prime. Also there are't as many inscriptions as kannada & tamil. Despite many telugu speakers the telugu literature is no where compared to kannada,bengal,tamil. It clearly lacks depth & breadth that other great indian languages like kannada,tamil,bengal have.

There is no influence of telugu on any other language which shows that it is relatively new language compared to other old dravidian languages like kannada & tamil. Infact there is influence of kannada & tamil over telugu.

Would somebody add dates to Nannayya and others? I wish some Telugu friends would add more detail (like dates) and improve this artilce. I speak Tamil and I don't agree with the above user's comments. Tamils praise Telugu as a sweet language. Tamil poets Subramanya Bharati and Baratidasan extol telugu. Late record of literature has got nothing to do with the quality, beauty and value of a language. Telugu is not a new language, by any means just because the formal literature starts later. Sanskrit does not even have a script of its own and Vedas were oral tradition and so on. No one dare say Skt is an undeveloped language. I honestly hope some Telugu friends would take interest to improve this article. I found the articles on Telugu Script and Language quite informative, but they have to be properly wikified. --Aadal 18:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

bullshit...telugu literature had hardly been acknoweldged by others. There is't enough work to make comparision visa-visa other indian languages. You can hardly see any worthy material on web on the telugu literature despite some tardy claims like highest spoken,nice to languge to speak etc..

Their culture stinks to the core. Telugu literature perhaps can be rated far below than other indians languages. It's not worthy to take note of.